From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75EF921F3B0 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s99Je0iA027908 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:40:00 -0700 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:40:00 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] bulk packet transmission X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:40:30 -0000 lwn.net has an article about a set of new patches that avoid some locking overhead by transmitting multiple packets at once. It doesn't work for things with multiple queues (like fq_codel) in it's current iteration, but it sounds like something that should be looked at and watched for latency related issues. http://lwn.net/Articles/615238/ David Lang