From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B0321F235
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
	by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
	t0MM94ex027863; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:09:04 -0800
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:09:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Richard Smith <smithbone@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54C13F47.1010203@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1501221407420.21455@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <54B5D28A.3010906@gmail.com>
	<7B1EA8F0-FCB6-4A37-950F-2558FC751DE8@gmail.com>
	<54C038D0.1000305@gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1501211553090.21864@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<54C0BD22.3000608@gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1501220110170.19609@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<54C13F47.1010203@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Recording RF management info _and_ associated
 traffic?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:09:36 -0000

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Richard Smith wrote:

>>> The WNDR3700 was completely unresponsive both via WiFi and when I
>>> tried its IP connected directly to it's switch with a Cat-5.  I also
>>> have a serial port mod on that wndr3700 so I connected up to that
>>> instead.
>> 
>> hmm, it's not common to have it be unresponsive on the wired network.
>
> It's uncommon to me. :)  This unit has travelled with me for years while I 
> worked for OLPC and its see a lot of different wireless environments. 
> Granted never one with this many apple clients.  Usually 7-8 Linux/Windows 
> machines and a pile of XOs.
>
> So this happened a lot at your SCALE setups?

two years ago we had a problem with the APs dropping off, but last year 
everything worked wonderfully.

David Lang