From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A20B21F1A1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
	by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
	t1CLkl5e020728 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:46:47 -0800
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:46:47 -0800 (PST)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502121345180.27379@nftneq.ynat.uz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] MTU question
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:47:17 -0000

It occured to me as I was driving home last night that if the APs are working to 
combine packets into a single transmission due to the high overhead of 
independent transmissions, would it possibly improve wifi performance to just 
configure a larger MTU?

Has anyone done any experimentation in this area?

David Lang