From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBB0921F3BE for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t2D1Z93b032292; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:35:09 -0800 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:35:09 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= In-Reply-To: <17E04C4E-CB66-4E83-A082-566904A88A32@toke.dk> Message-ID: References: <7DFEBF4E-513B-4F41-B559-46BC9857AB40@gmail.com> <5501F7B7.9040105@gmail.com> <17E04C4E-CB66-4E83-A082-566904A88A32@toke.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="680960-1381021357-1426210509=:21504" Cc: Alan Jenkins , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt bits not in OpenWrt (renamed thread) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:35:41 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --680960-1381021357-1426210509=:21504 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> sqm-scripts / luci-app-sqm is only available from CC (trunk). The CC >> version can be installed manually, but it will complain & leave you >> with >> warnings about it on every subsequent package install. > > Note that we've been discussing backporting it to BB, but had one outstanding > bug that we fixed recently. Been waiting until that fix has been out in CC for > sufficiently long to weed out any adverse effects, then we'll get it into BB > as well if possible :) Is the idea of functional interface naming something that is reasonable to talk about for CC? David Lang --680960-1381021357-1426210509=:21504--