From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E68621F1D1
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
	by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
	t2GHYdIZ021344; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:34:39 -0800
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5CE9eZUA0EbHrzC1Sjad5g_gu_ad7RnLCbeq6ygYE0JA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503161033310.32001@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <CAA93jw5CE9eZUA0EbHrzC1Sjad5g_gu_ad7RnLCbeq6ygYE0JA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="===============7748559201687511412=="
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:35:10 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--===============7748559201687511412==
Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far
> that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative.

If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take?

David Lang

> 2) We need a new box that anyone can use that should be available for 2-3
> years to come.
>
> 3) I'd like to be focused mostly on wifi, personally.
>
> Do we have more top-level problems than this?
>
>
--===============7748559201687511412==
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii
Content-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503161033311.32001@nftneq.ynat.uz>
Content-Description: 
Content-Disposition: INLINE

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--===============7748559201687511412==--