From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6A021F1D4 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t2GHnmI6021454; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:49:48 -0800 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:49:48 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:50:21 -0000 On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far >>> that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an >>> alternative. >>> >> >> If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take? > > > diddly. this isn't sold as an AP, it's a bit pricy, but not insanely expensive ($200-250 depending on options) 1GHz dual core AMD cpu, 4G 1066RAM 2 mini PCIe 3xGid-E being that it's not a consumer AP, it's nto going to be as cheap, but it's also not going to be phased out as quickly in favor of a new model. using a mini PCIe wifi card makes it easier to switch to something with good support. does it look like it would do the job? David Lang