From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2478321F336 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 04:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id A4A30A1; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:31:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435145475; bh=6hy7qNwbaYwGScaw2IfZGBmJgxrqSpbRD64sI73/AXs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h16igqWrFhVn4L+k4srfO76yigQca5zHtUwfkiqVIAi0ji5dcfveByOtuJiZjFTqh sBw6UzcdfF25Srs4cxx/biJDO6hAQoitT0QaxzYhhVKbaWMLqLWlCPzMlR+zdcMvMj TSqHTofrp28IMjDqPOek5BNuL60KXdQNZ2B0EQzo= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05C39F; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:31:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 13:31:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-897746530-1435145475=:9487" Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:31:48 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---137064504-897746530-1435145475=:9487 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > As Dave said it would be nice see RRUL data from the same testbed. It > would be so nice if flint had a way to send different sized TCP packets… > (I guess this might be faked with MSS clamping in the router and > relaying on path MTU discovery?) What kind of tests should I run? I have rrul results now, both at the same time as running iperf3. I set iperf3 to run with 10 parallel streams, different MSS per test, and let it run for 30 seconds into the rrul test. So in all the tests, iperf3 session stops running half way into the rrul test. I set sqm to 500M up and down on eth0, ECN up and down, and not to squash DSCP in any direction. http://swm.pp.se/aqm/rrul-wrt1200ac-150624.pdf Tell me if there is more information I can provide or tests to run. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se ---137064504-897746530-1435145475=:9487--