From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E6721F3E4 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3F1C7A1; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:07:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435201679; bh=+vh/RlVm1P3K5Ki1qFVOa1pHvD1L8RqsuTLIhVk1ZBk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B1SZ1Y1t56eRdDn2QBNeeBc/IopJm/1WF6HyY8nKOeR53XI2wYF+4orvg8O7Y+qkc MfHTOVGtDafyEPknRmbvRbzPjqb4YVegu0FQn3na2Bl7gYqrFOdcfruD9i2SgXYe7L 7grzf6LISAFoS2gQtZNaWkcYRzNcq1gX7DEa8pY4= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F5C9F; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 05:07:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Aaron Wood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:08:31 -0000 On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Aaron Wood wrote: > Here's a long-range (indoors) test result with the 1900AC. I have about > 9dB snr at the client (all the way across my house, which has plaster > walls): > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/737736 > > download buffering is the 1900ac, upload buffering is the mac laptop's > driver. Both are trying too hard to deliver those packets, I think. > > The driver has crazy over-buffering in the face of poor signal conditions. > OTOH, I'm amazed at the throughput numbers. But this is an 80Mhz wide 5Ghz > channel, in a quiet environment, so it has LOTS of airspace to work in. Is this over a 25/5 Internet connection? Because I wouldn't imagine that you would get any significant buffering on the wifi with that kind of Internet access speed. I regularily get hundreds of megabit/s over 802.11ac wifi. Also, I guess this is WRT1900ACv1? Running what OS? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se