From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA29A21F841
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 3D909A1; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:38:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1435343897; bh=AeBNAcvg9EfnYjQFomg4ui/nEmerxAbY1DjlTOAk830=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vs7AtsMvWr/KhVDJIiZcJLKlPsJCzlf+abQ07uvE5Pe/r5IpRSynlZJQvYJxJe5Wb
	0ZVzy2lg0xx4hzR74htoQbLaUA5TIzN4kv2Z9VlxIgKHP24O2Gznpnm3ILrv1I+5Ct
	6kO3/Rj2iKPo/qJjtP1OydwTHNLr/UVi0M/oQeu0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E69F;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:38:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:38:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4kfdcF36b6hFoan5YawQu8ZDB78vNNYcur4B5RKenc-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506262034290.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CANmMgnF7eE4_eZu=LySLj9LEtqS5+b=c8zMf3c4vOb2sHx0a5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw4gndJFGyQfdVwxu_D_5R-BifKBEKRo2qbsoRxU0qtYvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6LkVW0C=Vm6rxVGt8RtoB6P5TxHmFf45Jqy-kBPasUWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK-n8j4NSBLFssSNjHvjz+KV+TZcuuDTYn98L2EQU1mv3+StLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506231436440.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<A76B3051-B521-4FAB-B81C-66835D053FE5@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506241233560.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<43D5C3CE-F1F4-4BA5-AEB9-55348661C7BA@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261252140.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261640320.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAJq5cE3W_yXgK4Ww+jWSwYD0EPEEMTbN0QKWMkjocYx98UHHUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506261826510.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAJq5cE1GsY1ruxP24Qo5HCOWGf+tK2BOB4roiZtMnFkkzpcg3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw4b__aqSHdcOQM40v-tVmDUFH6yO9J1-Z-BYwgS855-GA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw4kfdcF36b6hFoan5YawQu8ZDB78vNNYcur4B5RKenc-A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest
 build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:38:48 -0000

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use
> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s
> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the
> client and server.

Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"?

Where do you want the queueing to happen? Egress from the WRT1200AC 
towards the server? Then setting the WAN port of the WRT1200AC to 100 
megabit/s would work, yes.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se