From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58A021F9E1 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6CD18A1; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:23:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435429437; bh=+N3TvMgKACeHbXY4OdU0hhYqQRrlMR8j+PQkOY7zIdM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ajKl4EvDysJzkiIelsrs4xFK5BBgicoyzYP5lFQUU5Zv2eLDE6ujpVuJygUaSOFra R9buKEnhCoSHD66Su5QZz1dKqAucrQ7c107nPUuLOCdcc08lNHST0Vzqw9+tA0PppT vXED8YnrPqmLwww+L1r24VydOhIcYR6klW/jZE5o= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608939F; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:23:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <43D5C3CE-F1F4-4BA5-AEB9-55348661C7BA@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 18:24:30 -0000 On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > Maybe you are dropping at the internal switch? A lot of manufacturers > ran everything through the switch, even the uplink, in recent years. > This will make things hard to fix. Looking at the vlans and pvids it looks like they've connected the SoC to port 5 and 6 on the switch, port 4 is the "Internet" port, and 0-3 is LAN1-4 port. Sigh, I had hoped at least eth0 (WAN/Internet) was a physically dedicated port. root@OpenWrt:~# swconfig dev switch0 show Global attributes: enable_vlan: 0 Port 0: mask: 0x004e: (0) 1 2 3 6 qmode: 0 status: link: up, speed: 1000 Mbps, duplex: full link: 1000 pvid: 0 Port 1: mask: 0x004d: 0 (1) 2 3 6 qmode: 0 status: link: down link: 0 pvid: 0 Port 2: mask: 0x004b: 0 1 (2) 3 6 qmode: 0 status: link: down link: 0 pvid: 0 Port 3: mask: 0x0047: 0 1 2 (3) 6 qmode: 0 status: link: up, speed: 1000 Mbps, duplex: full link: 1000 pvid: 0 Port 4: mask: 0x0020: (4) 5 qmode: 0 status: link: up, speed: 1000 Mbps, duplex: full link: 1000 pvid: 0 Port 5: mask: 0x0010: 4 (5) qmode: 0 status: link: up, speed: 1000 Mbps, duplex: full link: 1000 pvid: 0 Port 6: mask: 0x000f: 0 1 2 3 (6) qmode: 0 status: link: up, speed: 1000 Mbps, duplex: full link: 1000 pvid: 0 -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se