From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5F221FC79 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id A6FCAA1; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:12:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435569158; bh=Lr/a9k2U2ZddQAW0QnS5HXX9+RnP0/J6XRxiIBRKrCs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1bB+s+xVCAsGgY/vdohG7OU5M31KoFZI7BSnXJLBMLGazikPv7qtJ1nDz23t+zncb nYPpZmNke6AmpbVNxOi4jxODcVO33WCZ1kJQ5Lqd3AmQUVwcjSwlTYWnPBr5bozK2c jpoKZtI88YMIVbaUBhxXFwRDAH9CG7fUMyhAILmA= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AC79F; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:12:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:12:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <4E002218-174D-44F9-91A0-C7F34B9E83C7@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <8B853F1C-DE5D-4F3D-88CC-CB8DA2D3E8B1@gmx.de> <04331509-F163-4184-90B4-8589073AFD62@gmx.de> <09BA156C-460D-4794-A082-33E805F3D6FD@gmx.de> <5436B48C-0803-46DA-B355-14E917A5BB37@gmx.de> <4E002218-174D-44F9-91A0-C7F34B9E83C7@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:13:10 -0000 On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > since coke overhead seems to work, you can switch back to link layer > none or set the overhead to 0 again. Thanks for testing this, which > helps getting sqm-scripts into better shape, but will not be helpful fur > your tests. In case you want to try fancy options for cake the advances > qdisc option strings in the queue discipline tab should work (caveat no > error checking so one typo and the qdisc will most likely not be set-up > properly). What I would like to get working is that it builds a fully working image out of the box. I have a problem with this, I believe it's because the ceropackages and openwrt standard packages have overlapping names: #openwrt/feeds$ grep -i sqm-scripts * grep: cero: Is a directory cero.index:Depends: +libc +SSP_SUPPORT:libssp +USE_GLIBC:librt +USE_GLIBC:libpthread lua luci-base +sqm-scripts cero.index:Source-Makefile: feeds/cero/net/sqm-scripts/Makefile cero.index:Package: sqm-scripts grep: cero.tmp: Is a directory grep: luci: Is a directory grep: luci.tmp: Is a directory grep: management: Is a directory grep: management.tmp: Is a directory grep: packages: Is a directory packages.index:Depends: +libc +SSP_SUPPORT:libssp +USE_GLIBC:librt +USE_GLIBC:libpthread lua luci-base +sqm-scripts packages.index:Source-Makefile: feeds/packages/net/sqm-scripts/Makefile packages.index:Package: sqm-scripts grep: packages.tmp: Is a directory grep: routing: Is a directory grep: routing.tmp: Is a directory grep: targets: Is a directory grep: targets.tmp: Is a directory grep: telephony: Is a directory grep: telephony.tmp: Is a directory How can I tell which one of these actually is included? Tried moving the feed statement so ceropackages was first but that doesn't seem to have helped, I still get OpenWrt regular sqm-scripts (no cake in luci-app-sqm). #openwrt/feeds$ find . -name luci-app-sqm ./packages/net/luci-app-sqm ./cero/luci/luci-app-sqm -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se