From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58B521FC81
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 7DBB0A1; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1435651215; bh=IiQ4VhYkhuN+ADi/JgJ80K1DgRkDEzO2uZZkbwPl0O8=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=T2lL+BPn7WdyUt4fvOUdvT0b8C6uEwB3BDh2EWztGhvBf/NG7hihHGTmagk9igbD1
	tPibpAxSuLh30oop/XzKjyvcmiu7elZeed/wOoAhqveGHoDiHztOaEMHJKeA6vrh4B
	BVyV9doLAzFEweH3dZATKAk/T5azKhEk/TacLAcg=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F5A9F;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw72jtxuj5jWWSL=QRY19zvNZB2tb7coOQCg+K03r4e1Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506300957340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CANmMgnF7eE4_eZu=LySLj9LEtqS5+b=c8zMf3c4vOb2sHx0a5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<8B853F1C-DE5D-4F3D-88CC-CB8DA2D3E8B1@gmx.de>
	<C91BE0FA-60DA-4655-A725-7CFF8522656D@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506281927150.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAJq5cE1zQDp3opc3dYX3fv6=qvsfhytLnmq1hB9PaQFbdp0Keg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6ULj5MmAxbBM-h8e0i19os_cqP_K7Y4UbintkHXj2A2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<04331509-F163-4184-90B4-8589073AFD62@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506282116310.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<09BA156C-460D-4794-A082-33E805F3D6FD@gmx.de>
	<5436B48C-0803-46DA-B355-14E917A5BB37@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290650350.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<D45E65B4-747F-4C7F-8176-88A71BECE9FB@gmx.de>
	<4E002218-174D-44F9-91A0-C7F34B9E83C7@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506291057540.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<87pp4eomfx.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506291345280.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<92199704-0522-447A-887A-1EE0E6AE4421@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw72jtxuj5jWWSL=QRY19zvNZB2tb7coOQCg+K03r4e1Cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest
 build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:00:48 -0000

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> attached is a patch for that, put it in your feeds/cero/kmod_sched_cake/patches
> directory, rebuild (make package/kmod-sched-cake/{clean,compile,install})

I compiled openwrt trunk with linux kernel v4.0 and this patch, and the 
results are here <http://swm.pp.se/aqm/rrul_150630-cake-l4.0-1.tar>.

As far as I can tell sirq load is higher rather than lower so it doesn't 
seem like kernel 4.0 has any significant performance benefits, rather the 
opposite.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se