From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9569721FFE2 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4DB0BA1; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:33:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435851214; bh=fn444STYXOcs/CWQmhrlPlXk4dysmx7soiZujJt9tKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V+gxHBNsoMrkaqjh6f0+w1PpkUeBjEnrEU0Dq2E0VDlI402F0cp90jngmOkfOxdvi SaQBhhCoLPwHda2AWzSWDb/gEAGHci64s/jR2zQeGqYKckhNXZLkitX6m0HE0SNxwM bCkA3JxEptIx9wLGx1CCzJ2/BwIPY0I+lAD3bFls= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454289F for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:33:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:33:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <04331509-F163-4184-90B4-8589073AFD62@gmx.de> <09BA156C-460D-4794-A082-33E805F3D6FD@gmx.de> <5436B48C-0803-46DA-B355-14E917A5BB37@gmx.de> <4E002218-174D-44F9-91A0-C7F34B9E83C7@gmx.de> <87pp4eomfx.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <92199704-0522-447A-887A-1EE0E6AE4421@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:34:06 -0000 Hi, for the sake of spreading this caveat, it does seem like the open source driver for wifi in the WRT1200AC isn't in very good shape. It works, but it's very slow, speeds vary depending on what kind of client I connect with, and the latency is horrible even with fq_codel or cake enabled on it. So if you were considering buying it and using it as a "daily driver" for wifi in your home, wait until I have better news regarding the wifi driver. I've already ping:ed Marvell about it and also spoken to one developer working for Belkin/Linksys, and they're aware of the problem. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se