From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F160D21F8C8
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Thu,  2 Jul 2015 12:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id A8A9CA1; Thu,  2 Jul 2015 21:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1435864352; bh=n+THPocEGAb84K88s1VcfpBfucLBQjHAxU1vSo40DpY=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dvM5HsP7BI8D78sYfbtpNJ3sf+zVL5badlBkktUIpfCFmqzT0B7aqj2GhbG7vnr3o
	rMgeFAVV+LYzvH4LiKEylTed7NKF/LVlnzqTFtOKvEUIqlNP8+r8jTWCCs4kof0fEV
	w1PEbwTwJtkm3DEvXfKsiuaLoumStzoLRvZFhAJ4=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34389F;
	Thu,  2 Jul 2015 21:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 21:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: dpreed@reed.com
In-Reply-To: <1435853164.272616634@apps.rackspace.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507022107360.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CANmMgnF7eE4_eZu=LySLj9LEtqS5+b=c8zMf3c4vOb2sHx0a5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw6ULj5MmAxbBM-h8e0i19os_cqP_K7Y4UbintkHXj2A2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<04331509-F163-4184-90B4-8589073AFD62@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506282116310.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> 
	<09BA156C-460D-4794-A082-33E805F3D6FD@gmx.de>
	<5436B48C-0803-46DA-B355-14E917A5BB37@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506290650350.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<D45E65B4-747F-4C7F-8176-88A71BECE9FB@gmx.de>
	<4E002218-174D-44F9-91A0-C7F34B9E83C7@gmx.de> 
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506291057540.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<87pp4eomfx.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506291345280.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<92199704-0522-447A-887A-1EE0E6AE4421@gmx.de>
	<CAA93jw72jtxuj5jWWSL=QRY19zvNZB2tb7coOQCg+K03r4e1Cg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506300957340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1506301135450.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1507021729450.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<87egkqzi06.fsf@toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1507021740240.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se> 
	<87a8vezhm8.fsf@toke.dk> <1435853164.272616634@apps.rackspace.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest
 build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:13:04 -0000

On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, dpreed@reed.com wrote:

> Having not bought a 1200ac yet, I was wondering if I should splurge for 
> the 1900ac v2 (which has lots of memory unlike the 1900ac v1).

>From what I can tell, the only thing that differs from the WRT1200AC is 
the radio. It still uses marvell radio but with more "everything", apart 
from RAM that (for some reason) the WRT1200AC has 512MB RAM but according 
to http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/linksys/wrt1900ac the WRT1900ACv2 only has 
256MB RAM.

I don't have any information on the performance of the radio in the 
WRT1900ACv2.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se