From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA73221FE32;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
	by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
	t7DLmmRC017935; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:48:48 -0700
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE210BeKF9HrbUd2Rj1-=imWcFXUPz8rumXu1aKxiiHRtw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508131447520.24853@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <E9C29602-7F1D-43AD-980C-050B58FA0AC6@iii.ca>
	<CAA93jw63gm1h9R4x_LZ2Po-Xqk8H1kYYmBtU_pb1kzVHOzAQbQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<356F5FEE-9FBD-4FF9-AC17-86A642D918A4@gmail.com>
	<5CC1DC90-DFAF-4A4D-8204-16CD4E20D6E3@gmx.de>
	<CAJq5cE0ShGs43O=BBNH5WWHPxaJq2TJsFGs06VTpgdUmB4x06w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D24A497-5784-493D-B409-F704804326A7@gmx.de>
	<1438361254.45977158@apps.rackspace.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1508071020220.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<DC3F5F31-B8BC-481F-A5DD-14D24874E776@gmail.com>
	<6E08E48D-5D53-48E5-B088-2D1DB5E566AD@gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1508071245480.2597@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<1438983998.16576420@apps.rackspace.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1508071504370.2597@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<1439066765.7348311@apps.rackspace.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1508081619140.2141@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<CAJq5cE210BeKF9HrbUd2Rj1-=imWcFXUPz8rumXu1aKxiiHRtw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Make-wifi-fast] [tsvwg] Comments on
 draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11e
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 21:49:13 -0000

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Jonathan Morton wrote:

> This is the difference between the typical 802.11n situation (one checksum
> per aggregate) and the mandatory 802.11ac capability of a checksum per
> packet.  As long as you also employ RTS/CTS when appropriate, the
> possibility of collisions is no longer a reason to avoid aggregating.

you say the 'typical' 802.11n situation is one checksum per transmission. Is 
this configurable in OpenWRT? or is it a driver/hardware issue? Does it require 
special client support?

David Lang