From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0154521F98F for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t7JHt1ls024038; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:55:01 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:55:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Steven Barth In-Reply-To: <55D450B7.6090404@openwrt.org> Message-ID: References: <55D450B7.6090404@openwrt.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] anyone have real info on the google router? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:55:26 -0000 On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Steven Barth wrote: > Wow, I must imagine it to be especially painful to reinvent the wheel > for all things QoS, WiFi optimizations, IPv6, Firewalling etc. and > rebuilding that on top of ChromeOS. It's all Linux under the covers, so there's probably far less reinventing than you think. I'll bet a lot of that stuff is either used as-is (with a different config system), or they just don't implement it (I doubt it has QoS for example) David Lang