From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E3B21FC1D
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id E1CD0A1; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:10:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1440007858; bh=A2nRpbEqmihF3G6WKoLgevY/ArW+q16b0W0uTVllRn4=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=R7htLwB2bGotCZ1oZfy5/mIz5HRBwS/N2u8jMmh1sEnCt1yaiySk9JZvHkGCRGmRf
	lr/jQjFoDgbMQvDHhjBW8Un72VNok2kU9sCJTvQwnpSKPphexuuTWUSfNtWyXwKSNI
	bTAzXpuDHz3Z70JoFWZ1Nq3f6Pietu4XKzXWuows=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33A9F;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:10:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:10:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508191054030.10162@nftneq.ynat.uz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508192009390.13227@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAGhGL2CxbsgyK2O8zDS-mjuwXZSCS66hQ3wgX+DFmh=KLZwm5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D450B7.6090404@openwrt.org>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1508191054030.10162@nftneq.ynat.uz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] anyone have real info on the google router?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:11:01 -0000

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, David Lang wrote:

> I'll bet a lot of that stuff is either used as-is (with a different 
> config system), or they just don't implement it (I doubt it has QoS for 
> example)

The marketing indicates that it can prioritize some hosts over others, so 
it'll have QoS, but it might just be whatever IPQ8064 offers as standard 
(since the packet forwarding hardware is controlled by proprietary 
firmware and proprietary kernel modifications to interact with this 
firmware).

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se