Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] RE : Save WiFi from the FCC - DEADLINE is in 3 days *September* 8
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:22:46 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1509081019380.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4zZC3PDL1U0wtQQm3TcCExAi062BBUFrquCR4-koPFzQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> wifi, and the carriers... which bugs me. 5.x ghz is the people's
> spectrum, that we should be free to use any way we want... and to make

Well, in the US at least, corporations are people, so...

But that aside, I don't know if there is anything that can be done really, 
unlicensed is unlicensed and if it's not free for everybody to use, what 
is it?

Also, isn't it pretty much the same players in wifi and LTE space, 
Qualcomm, Broadcom and the others, they're in both spaces and I don't see 
what they have to gain to make wifi worse?

And 802.11 isn't really open either, and the unlicensed spectrum still 
requires that devices are approved to be operated there, right, so if FCC 
and the likes do their job properly then these technologies should 
work together at least on the RF level?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-08  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-05 10:42 [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt.org vs make-wifi-fast Dave Taht
2015-09-05 14:04 ` [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt.org vs make-wifi-fast/Network Solutions price is high Rich Brown
2015-09-05 14:12 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Save WiFi from the FCC - DEADLINE is in 3 days *September* 8 Rich Brown
2015-09-05 22:05   ` Dave Taht
2015-09-06  9:02     ` [Cerowrt-devel] RE : [Bloat] " luca.muscariello
2015-09-08  7:55       ` Dave Taht
2015-09-08  8:22         ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2015-09-08  8:36           ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] RE : " Dave Taht
2015-09-08  8:55             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-09-08  9:21               ` Dave Taht
2015-09-08  9:55                 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-09-08 14:45               ` Michael Richardson
2015-09-08 12:13         ` [Cerowrt-devel] RE : [Bloat] " MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-09-06  9:57     ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Fred Stratton
2015-09-07 23:12   ` Jonathan Morton
2015-09-08  6:12     ` Rich Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1509081019380.8750@uplift.swm.pp.se \
    --to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox