From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE72C21F61A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t9NHvjps018420; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:57:45 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Aaron Wood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="===============5081592617420367740==" Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:58:10 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --===============5081592617420367740== Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Aaron Wood wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > >> I have a shiny new Linksys WRT1900ACS to test. >> >> I thought it might be nice to start with some comparisons of factory >> firmware vs OpenWRT with sqm enabled. >> > > Here are my results with the same router (unless the WRT1900ACS is > different from the WRT1900AC): > http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-160mbps.html the ACS has more flash (and ram IIRC) and is 1.6GHz instead of 1.2GHz David Lang > > > >> So I built and installed an openwrt trunk but the results were very >> non-impressive. Rrul test reported mulit-seconds of latency and it was >> equally non-impressive with sqm enabled or disabled. So I assumed that sqm >> in trunk on this device must not work yet. Then I wondered how well sqm in >> trunk was tested and that perhaps its broken for all devices. >> > > Trunk or the Chaos Calmer release? (I"m running CC RC1) > > >> My test setup: >> >> Laptop<--1000BaseT-->DUT<--1000baseT-->Server >> > > Which ports on the DUT were you using? are those local ports, or is one of > those the "internet" port? > > -Aaron > --===============5081592617420367740== Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --===============5081592617420367740==--