From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC21208AD4 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t9QIVWbP004999; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:31:32 -0800 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <97FBFC7A-625C-4597-A5D0-A075FD0F9533@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <562A5BE5.6010101@gmail.com> <8AAB9319-17D4-40E5-B5B6-DABCB63864CF@gmx.de> <562CF0E6.5050700@gmail.com> <562CFE58.9080806@gmail.com> <562D353D.9000308@gmail.com> <562E1C37.4000506@gmail.com> <02FDF355-F509-47E2-B63C-20CCE0ACA890@gmx.de> <97FBFC7A-625C-4597-A5D0-A075FD0F9533@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Problems testing sqm (solved) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:32:05 -0000 On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi David, > > On Oct 26, 2015, at 19:15 , David Lang wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> in terms of testing wifi, the most useful series of tests to conduct >>> at the moment - since we plan to fix per station queuing soon >> >> how soon is 'soon'? I'm going to be building my image for Scale in the next >> few weeks, any chance of having this available to put in it? > > Oh, interesting, slightly related question, do you typically disable > offloads for your scale deployed APs, or do you run with them enabled? (I am > pondering whether to expose a n offload toggle in luci-ap-sqm, but that only > makes sense if there are users willing to test the functionality more often > than once off). (Then again you probably do not use the GUI in the first place > in your deployment ;) or?) I'm using WNDR3800's again this year (~120 of them). I don't believe that it uses offloads in the first place. The APs operate in bridged mode connecting to the local wired network. A separate firewall/DHCP/etc server provides the Internet connectivity. see https://www.usenix.org/conference/lisa12/technical-sessions/presentation/lang_david_wireless for details on what I did a few years ago. This year we are moving to a new, larger location, but the same strategy is going to be used. David Lang