From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2F621F378
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 04:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 1EC8BA2; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:01:53 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1447761713; bh=7ufeOlddph5zySXR8oHd35hZozvoiXeRDOYhw22z7Y8=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xb+nAKnZ1q8t4kIu68wU9umtuAm48ZHQaC8Os9lCGz1Q3NM1QfL6N1Grb1RSl1FZY
	JFc6EKwSq29Lux3baEvkFOs/qD2gLNPzo3ZJz80HeazvxUIpO8Gw55mhkMu11ZnZZZ
	535fv2fWfArEChcMnci04q7lccIyac/lN/CexCp8=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FA5A1;
	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:01:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:01:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5Z=U+oXvassCC7LnNwSkTzxCHv3VQfL2EZg8De9-aqCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511171201410.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw5Z=U+oXvassCC7LnNwSkTzxCHv3VQfL2EZg8De9-aqCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] linksys vfp vs eabi?
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:02:20 -0000

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> My build of the linksys 1200 code is coming up with the eabi which is
> less efficient than the hard float alternative (armhf or vfp), Are
> people building for the eabi?
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/10/15/2 is the only reference
> I've found to this issue.

I don't know if this is related, but I remember I found something that 
made the openssl benchmark run a lot slower, I found a patch that 
basically disabled some hardware function for most ARM architectures 
because of some vague bug. I reverted the patch for the Armada 
architecture and got back the speed...

I believe it's this one I was mucking around with:

https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19420

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se