From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D413B2AF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0862CA2; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:25:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1457385947; bh=buNvEp9MQlNCcYE8HKjfRpGACNiYCAP31VqKVI3uw7E=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yXXHhAcVkuOquLzozYo2nfPdgNVi+O+Z6tHYd4T6skYnoA7V2s+jNL4uBF8Td98Uy HmurKE27TRuds8w66qfep/pSqnPwYB8Nm/vW53IR9CnFt8Hzfrcxe4b6U7iFjklhjx 82L4JRSTm9qs71x9oNGVmye8QO4OeknXAv1lON04= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20CFA1; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:25:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:25:46 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: dpreed@reed.com cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" In-Reply-To: <1457216372.19224891@apps.rackspace.com> Message-ID: References: <1457216372.19224891@apps.rackspace.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] odroid C1+ status X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:25:48 -0000 On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, dpreed@reed.com wrote: > Why would Comcast even bother? A Raspberry Pi 3 would be better, and > far more available. (though I think the slow Ethernet port and low end > WiFi on the Raspberry Pi 3 would make it sort of marginal, it's > certainly quite fine for a low-end OpenWRT machine if you want to live > at 50 Mb/sec) I have a banana pi router, which has 1 WAN and 4 LAN. I haven't really used it that much, but during my initial testing it seemed that it at least had proper SOC connections to the ethernet ports, which gave it a lot better performance than the USB ethernet that the RPi has. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se