From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (lang.hm [66.167.227.134])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A461D3B2BD
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
 by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id u5OKRCHr021155;
 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:27:18 -0700
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: Eric Johansson <esj@eggo.org>
cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <9a37f44d-7e6b-f31f-58ad-1dd7eac8ee71@eggo.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606241323310.2687@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <CAA93jw4bFAKVvNYSRj=_nZRZkd9Nkkw-fKz56+sU59givEPFCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lh1xihnv.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
 <CAA93jw4kSz71gUBSPtZb-ggwVYJPq2uiC8LvrjNA7HORj36arg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87vb0zpnel.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
 <CAA93jw7prgQRzFqNjmCPpqvR_nXV2U1CwW3qa_rh5my4spTayA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87oa6rpl7h.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
 <CAA93jw5gojjWGUSWD9uwqQ2yTOQ+YSmkuEzMLvB5hivAKP3R2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87mvmbpi7d.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
 <0173B4D2-C84A-4200-B388-F8E964CAEB86@gmail.com>
 <87mvma26gf.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
 <9a37f44d-7e6b-f31f-58ad-1dd7eac8ee71@eggo.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Why we are discussing ARM [was: Cross-compiling
 to armhf]
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:27:25 -0000

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Eric Johansson wrote:

> On 6/24/2016 7:04 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> Agreed. Who's going to save us?
>
>  * kickstart our own,
>  * license a design and enhance it to our needs (rpi 4??)
>  * work a deal with mikrotek to freeup docs on one of their boards so
>    we can replace router os with one of our own. see
>    http://www.balticnetworks.com/mikrotik-hap-ac-lite-dual-band-indoor-access-point-built-in-antennas.html.

There are a number of mikrotik boards that are listed as having OpenWRT support, 
including one with 9 gig-e ports and 3 microPCI slots that can hold radios

http://routerboard.com/RB493G
http://routerboard.com/RB493AH