From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA313B2A0
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 13024A4; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1474480843; bh=97bq9ppt+mFiBBlvWbmCI5m9ktoWVAXbTw6IhdoeeU0=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hth0emDuOO9ay/GGVahpvC+dNLzK8D93OiIJjVjadjr7G/uTZc5vjzUxom4Y8iEpL
 RkPFeW9NefH8+j/rKZSjevJ+ji+oEbhEJwdskIhVBdqD60P1o6vFpedMmnWhIwsefU
 7Nyy1Pxr/lNcvL/xOWdWGIyWF09AOKS+IS5qYJPk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645A4A3;
 Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: dpreed@reed.com
cc: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>, 
 Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, 
 "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <1474477488.832416984@apps.rackspace.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1609211957280.1477@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <1474146692.035424358@mobile.rackspace.com>
 <CAA93jw5GKGyEPQNG=WYqV-BhN+eVVK+NnQeysSELAN0RXG0xqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw4-MD3Yzwoupen-2PZ4UQc66JAWtLc5E2k-ai-ZY+MFow@mail.gmail.com>
 <1474403262.975213436@apps.rackspace.com> 
 <4a1fd48e-b1c4-2e75-d55a-417a83a572d4@gmail.com>
 <1474477488.832416984@apps.rackspace.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] BBR congestion control algorithm for TCP
 innet-next
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:00:47 -0000

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, dpreed@reed.com wrote:

> Of course, the best propaganda is the stuff that you can get engineers 
> in the field to promulgate based on their "gut feel".

Yes, I guess people who have been staring at traffic graphs and Netflow 
collector system output for 10-15 years have no insight into what and how 
much traffic is going where.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se