From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3B43BA8E for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 03:23:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (syslog [10.0.0.100]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CCA56FDD; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:22:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:23:07 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Mikael Abrahamsson cc: Matt Taggart , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <093970f7-b07d-e989-7721-fe9b5d1cb5e3@lackof.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I so love seeing stuff like this X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2019 08:23:15 -0000 On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, David Lang wrote: > >> I had high hopes for these, but the driver development is not working well, >> it's one guy at Marvell who does it in his spare time, nobody else has the >> info to be able to work on it. > > It's the wifi you're worried about? I've read about people having problems > with the wifi part. Yes, it's the wifi development and support that is the biggest problem with these APs. David Lang