From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C683BA8E for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:07:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6D3A3AF; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:07:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1538420839; bh=pLv4mMbKnfYSBkX0kX4aWTa2cpy/OANPx62CpB1kl44=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RK4PioX6OAAaVQlwlxxfFbrdekYmsoJHZxgtVU1GQYMQa2F8Zp38fGGD5pZs6EQ/4 M9WA3gE/xM+2AV2cDo0g0y0627uTq66DfXzbTmNlv4UplXeZgI7cbqAeHUhX5bSlu7 +JMupaiuZXPL2a4kZRFI4TEy/gTSKMdb4awBE5Ws= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ED99F; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:07:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:07:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 on comcast with 18.06.1 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 19:07:21 -0000 On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:58 AM Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Here you go! Going to go look at the firewall rules in a sec.... > > I changed the rules to allow 547 and 546, no difference. I even > flushed the ipv6tables rules entirely, > and I'm running without that for a while. I can certainly imagine > comcast's dhcpv6 server giving up on me.... Looking at your pcap file, there is no IPv6 to be had what so ever. No answer to RS or DHCPv6 SOLICIT. It doesn't get more basic than that. > It's nice to know, btw, someone is still messing with homenet. Having > zero funding for too many years burned me out on even trying. But I > expected ipv6 to keep working without any more help from me! :( Yes, your problem has nothing to do with basic IPv6 function. Windows Vista on launch day does the same you're doing, but since nothing is answering then you get no IPv6. So either your packets aren't making it to the Comcast upstream router, or it doesn't do any of the basics. I thought this would be a PD problem or something, but this is more basic than that. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se