From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEEB3BA8E for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id D9CC3AF; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:27:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1538663265; bh=carGJd81ReXpD+ZSNuaKTXnf40kXnNpgLi9wNIYYewo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=B85WcWvE+CVCtYoxTOth3GkWRl/XluWFS5O3kpSQ3VKSZKeimqSQJqI2vUd4JB3nS zR5a5uWS/1wmKxrevLl7jTlHDScR7RzAxjzLY14QTbFXbmVe1/J8dg7pHZE9xfzOvY assl36lr9Fs5IU63hL6r2uXbDUJDVKQPT6ifp1Cs= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D549F; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:27:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:27:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] hacking on babel 1.8.3 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:27:48 -0000 On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > I've been trying to deploy the latest openwrt to all ~40 routers I > have. (I did get a reprieve on having to close the lab, but I have to > update the whole campus as part of it). I managed to get Homenet working on 18.06.1. There is a conflict with some files so you have to do "opkg remove" on the dhcpv6 server, but after that it installs cleanly and seems to work. I installed it on two machines and they did all the homenet+hncp+babel things. One thing I discovered is that I would like DHCPv6-PD lifetime capping, so I can control the source address selection of hosts. I had two different upstreams with PDs and one had much longer lifetime compared to the other. So hosts chose the one with the highest lifetime, which wasn't what I wanted. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se