From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9593B2A4 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:47:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5BB17B3; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:47:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1540309623; bh=KYNQjGRJkzwcMah+v7o1H1J7zirhX6u7tMsY2h7s1fo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W229IQUhXWzj12CkjRmiLfhSEy+G63aqiyOpVhQMOg9gGwExIh+eLGb2NcFXzMW9F BwdgTPMqo7CwbVDOf0VxPF9ITP5eDNkUo0oX1Er+WOoNWvRqFOmSwxSc71DwkdkkEs gGwZ9kLxjPTo6IP9Z92J5SFRGG9fk+OnUMqXPCe4= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5966EB0; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:47:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:47:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: Ted Lemon , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <10E89375-2591-49B2-9A67-AA0E14B17649@fugue.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] meanwhile... .home, finally has a home.arpa. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 15:47:04 -0000 On Tue, 23 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > Mikael is the sole survivor here, so far as I know. I ended up disabling the homenet stuff because lifetimes didn't align with my preference in provider (my non-preferred provider has longer lease-times than my preferred provider, so in the whole source-selection mechanism my non-preferred provider won). Also, there is no good way to detect L2 failures towards providers. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-patterson-intarea-ipoe-health-05 solves. > As examples that persist, dhcpv6-pd renewals seem to be broken in > openwrt still, so I get a bunch of prefixes... and a few a days later > they vanish. I get static routes to nowhere, often, out of that. And: > with only a /60 available, I also run out of prefixes to allocate if > something reboots at the wrong time at the wrong place, and so on. I do not have this problem. I get /56 PD from provider and it hasn't changed yet. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se