From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4173CB35 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:36:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 94E4EAF; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:36:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1544016972; bh=w9CTFQc/ERungeviDFh/A9gf7bMy3NSc2fh9nsH649U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=viVdaT9SD7glk6hZk+NeW14U1vqnrtI0WH+8Ms3c7XcdiCc6hEix7rKYZatpO5Dj2 VtJJAkxrDi+iSCHXRtFHb/J1crEnZg5bCqfL3q6izkbB75xvBIFMH5bC/U/TTHdIki OjxgTfiYMgr/qjiABvWXqoI6lcDCLYe2Y8YOfHjg= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F2F9F; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:36:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:36:12 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Toke_H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= cc: Dave Taht , cerowrt-devel In-Reply-To: <87efawglui.fsf@toke.dk> Message-ID: References: <87efawglui.fsf@toke.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="-137064504-1675878804-1544016972=:8891" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] dlte X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:36:14 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---137064504-1675878804-1544016972=:8891 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Mikael Abrahamsson writes: > >> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> I expect dave reed to comment, so I'll withhold mine for now >>> >>> https://kurti.sh/pubs/dLTE-Johnson-HotNets-2018.pdf >> >> When I read the first page I was hopeful, then unfortunately I got >> disappointed and just quickly scanned the rest. It's still tunneled and >> the same architecture, just more distributed. > > OK, now I read the paper, and I think you may have missed the part where > they say that they terminate the tunnelling at the AP and assign new IPs > whenever a client roams. So it's basically WiFi APs over the LTE > layer-2... Which is pretty cool, I think :) Thanks, I now looked again and 4.1 said "local cores" and that's when my eyes rolled and I skipped on. But 4.2 is indeed what I have been talking about... -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se ---137064504-1675878804-1544016972=:8891--