From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1633C3BA8E
 for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 14:14:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 98803B2; Fri,  1 Feb 2019 20:14:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1549048444; bh=TUZjbgWAOJ9SrbRMA0oTFgqdcqvz9Ek1ijzated/HF0=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=W/qqQL1RyleGeGqtYNjT5r4KZcqrZ68m/INqaxM66FxLl+0ADsQK/77O04+Hr2131
 +l2D/lMRvPR/zWemGLxEUpz/KuYm5RZJxAp6gPL5QBveK6w6QR0fvZr7mcyx8cCTgf
 dIjg1H65/n/B/EBcir7VIalhhIa6ht/DFU/caEfI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95429B0;
 Fri,  1 Feb 2019 20:14:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 20:14:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Matt Taggart <matt@lackof.org>
cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <093970f7-b07d-e989-7721-fe9b5d1cb5e3@lackof.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902012007140.23912@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw5abJtUoHSD3e7gi8krSuMMv6L1X0e5DwfB2ockH1eiCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <093970f7-b07d-e989-7721-fe9b5d1cb5e3@lackof.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] I so love seeing stuff like this
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 <cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
 <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 19:14:06 -0000

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Matt Taggart wrote:

> Anyone else have inexpensive, better cpu, and 802.11ac capable
> replacements for WNDR3800?

Used WRT1200AC, WRT1900ACv2 or WRT1900ACS.

Anything with Marvell Armada 385 makes for a wonderful CPU based 
forwarding platform. I have WRT1200AC myself (but I don't use the wifi, I 
have Ubiquiti for that). However it does CAKE on my 250/100 Internet 
connection with CPU cycles to spare.

Otherwise I hear a lot about the TP-LINK Archer C7 as some kind of 
"reference stable OpenWrt platform".

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se