From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave@taht.net>
Cc: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-06 is in last call
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:11:56 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908220801280.21548@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnkyea04.fsf@taht.net>
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019, Dave Taht wrote:
> Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:
>
>> Maybe attached patch is more comprehensive?
>
> Yep! why was diffserv8 5 in the first place?
"diffserve8 is 5"? I don't understand. Do you mean 001000?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3662
3.2. PHB configuration
Either a Class Selector (CS) PHB [RFC2474], an Experimental/Local Use
(EXP/LU) PHB [RFC2474], or an Assured Forwarding (AF) PHB [RFC2597]
may be used as the PHB for the LE traffic aggregate. This document
does not specify the exact DSCP to use inside a domain, but instead
specifies the necessary properties of the PHB selected by the DSCP.
If a CS PHB is used, Class Selector 1 (DSCP=001000) is suggested.
So CS1 is the original PHB for LE. However, it has problems and was never
really deployed and I was one who pushed for a specific codepoint within
000xxx for LE, that might have a chance to be deployed internet-wide.
000001 seems as good as any.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-03 18:39 [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2019-02-03 20:02 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-02-03 22:42 ` David P. Reed
2019-02-04 0:17 ` Dave Taht
2019-02-04 1:12 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] " Jonathan Morton
2019-02-04 6:02 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-04 6:58 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] " Dave Taht
2019-02-04 7:11 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-04 10:23 ` Dave Taht
2019-02-04 10:34 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-02-04 10:40 ` Dave Taht
2019-08-21 15:07 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2019-08-21 16:38 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] " Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-08-21 16:52 ` Dave Taht
2019-08-22 6:11 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1908220801280.21548@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave@taht.net \
--cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox