From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A2E208A7C for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:25:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id bs8so27630935wib.1 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:25:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; bh=vYmlSaub7nRf5IRM3OyFYrfZsd7yZmD1wLLEjKhdBRI=; b=uvFte/nk47XCujpZDjOmu+ERmVwNbw5ycME14m/jvMBDLYqAxqNPZDkHbdtAwj0v10 wBgjpRrKIIOAubZgGHn7vnxKSpDpSropNFIM5izbUGnfr8uz5mxhBYI9aNU5MHKaI1ZH WU1+LI/xqvD/tHsNK/td2d3Djx+Sp3bl1VuH99rxrBLUqjx4c85caRb9+nKy8Tu7tfig jc9s4m1hRTY+hRJhu8fX8s6sYgyykE4vNnUGqU8qbl8YUYWK2wBkMz1u5NPCs2W6T7Kz +3IPgQuaLuGbHM7Pte2XGlE+q91PJDwdFod9eqxtZ5yn8xyxBEB2HQOQaZJKJ2eCHc0k dgkA== X-Received: by 10.180.103.201 with SMTP id fy9mr17416449wib.31.1421789134036; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from eeec.lan (host180-253-dynamic.8-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [87.8.253.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ud4sm4598183wib.0.2015.01.20.13.25.31 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:25:33 -0800 (PST) From: Enrico Mioso X-Google-Original-From: Enrico Mioso Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:25:28 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: mrkiko@localhost.localdomain To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu In-Reply-To: <5605.1421770418@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Message-ID: References: <877fy7myfb.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <54811670.5030703@audiocodes.com> <8761dqjuuh.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <5605.1421770418@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [discuss] [cdc_ncm] Refactoring cdc_ncm X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:26:05 -0000 A third follow-up: if you can just point me out to some interesting functions I might use to do these things, it would be ok. I am thinking that you woudln't use the list framework of the kernel in the networking subsystem for queuing packets. I know - I am misinformed a lot. Thank you, Enrico On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:13:38 > From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu > To: Enrico Mioso > Cc: Dave Taht , > "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" > > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [discuss] [cdc_ncm] Refactoring cdc_ncm > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:28:48 +0100, Enrico Mioso said: > >> We are trying to change the way the cdc_ncm.c driver generate frames. We need >> to let it order parts of the packet in a different way. > > You're going to have to repeat that, and explain why you think re-ordering parts > of the packet is going to work. (Hint - what happens when this packet with > oddly ordered parts arrives at a host that is expecting RFC-standard ordering?) >