From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from z.eggo.org (z.eggo.org [80.235.105.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87A93B2CC for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:59:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BE8580093 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:59:12 +0300 (EEST) Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id MGFn0lEsngf3 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:59:12 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D405800D9 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:59:12 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harvee.org Received: from z.eggo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z.eggo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lUUvyAdRnkh7 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:59:12 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.9.71] (unknown [146.115.109.236]) by z.eggo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0E74580093 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:59:11 +0300 (EEST) To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Eric Johansson Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:59:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] anyone tried a wrtnode? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:59:14 -0000 I assume you've seen this list https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Ath9k I'm starting to play with mikrotek devices. routeros is a consultants full employment program so replacing it would be nice. --- eric On 6/21/2016 2:36 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > http://wrtnode.com/w/ > > ... > > What I am actually looking for is the smallest/cheapest minimum > possible box with an ath9k in it. > >