From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EC621F627 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XAmQ6-0000AJ-PN for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:48:50 +0200 Received: from 32.97.110.56 ([32.97.110.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:48:50 +0200 Received: from wmf by 32.97.110.56 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:48:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Wes Felter Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:48:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.110.56 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Ideas on how to simplify and popularize bufferbloat control for consideration. X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:48:55 -0000 The Netgear stock firmware measures bandwidth on every boot or link up (not sure which) and I would suggest doing the same for CeroWRT. Do you need to measure Internet bandwidth or last mile bandwidth? For link bandwidth it seems like you can solve a lot of problems by measuring to the first hop router. Does the packer pair technique work on TDMA link layers like DOCSIS? -- Wes Felter