From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D57821F2B5 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRQkv-0004Vt-D3 for cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:07:09 +0200 Received: from 32.97.110.56 ([32.97.110.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:07:09 +0200 Received: from wmf by 32.97.110.56 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:07:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Wes Felter Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:06:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.110.56 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 10GigE nics and SFP+ modules? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:07:41 -0000 On 9/8/14, 11:06 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote: > I encourage you strongly to look to using Optical LX style fibre if > you are moving to 10G. The cost of structured cabling and the length > of runs is a lot cheaper than Cat6a/7 runs needed for 10gbit copper. Twinax is cheaper than optical or base-T. -- Wes Felter IBM Research - Austin