Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Turris Omnia
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 16:54:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31syoe0jx.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> (raw)

I can't find any mailing list specifically about the Omnia, I hope
someone here may have some tips...

I've put my omnia into production, but the wireless is extremely
sub-optimal.

Things like the droid netinfo widget show 433 Mbps for the 11ac and 72
Mbps on the 2.4, but throughput sucks.

The thoughput seems backwards:  upload speeds eclipse download speeds.

I'm using it only for my 802.11 wlan; its "wan" interface is on my
primary switch, and I've set it for routing rather than bridging, with a
/27 for each of the 5.0 and 2.4 (and a /24 its wired lan ports, which
are not currently in use).

As an example, rsync/ssh/tcp/ip reports net throughput of around 6 Mbps
down on the 11ac, and around ten times that for upload.

I tried 40Mhz and 20Mhz as well as just 11n on the 5.0 and there was no
improvement over the 80Mhz 11ac.

I'm doing a (Gentoo) emerge sync right now on the laptop, which only
does 11n on 2.4.  That is almost OK for a change.  On the omnia,
luci/admin/status/overview reports 135 Mbps for both up and down
from/to the laptop (during said emerge sync).  And the rsync(1)
output looks like it may be updating about that fast.

That is vastly better than I previously saw.

But even so, the 5.0 radio still never shows more than a 6Mbps download
speed and spikes of up to 300 Mbps upload.

I can't find anything online about backwards throughput for  802.11.
The only search results talk about wan links rather than wlan links.

Does anyone have any ideas of how to diagnose or fix this?

Thanks,

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

             reply	other threads:[~2016-11-06 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-06 21:54 James Cloos [this message]
2016-11-07  0:52 ` David Lang
2016-11-07  1:01   ` James Cloos
2016-11-07  1:45     ` David Lang
2016-11-07  5:29       ` James Cloos
2016-11-07  5:47         ` David Lang
2016-11-07 14:30           ` James Cloos
2016-11-07 14:54             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2016-11-07 16:00               ` James Cloos
2016-11-07 17:41             ` Dave Täht
2016-11-07  9:59         ` Sebastian Moeller
2016-11-07 14:35           ` James Cloos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m31syoe0jx.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org \
    --to=cloos@jhcloos.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox