From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.22.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464D23B2AB for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 16:58:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 38A2C1EA93; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 21:58:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1478469515; bh=kWNfbRAUvXz1Mh6BUr/9fybztS+iv2XcpDxnkJ+qRK4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=rJE3jsJ/C/za7pr8rxsot4lHhfZ3EQAHqfIgL+NVr78k12o85gsSUow5LXYKYLTYn tNVq8sdhrqtL9tVYesV8VrJzVHT/Azeh/HqK+EFBFH8iqlrn+HpaCWdME8m41T2iWn Ae9fFFy/rxFadCaMsrNWXj1GWHXlY9B/+X9pmHv0= Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 55C59107B7BE1; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 21:54:58 +0000 (UTC) From: James Cloos To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Copyright: Copyright 2016 James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 16:54:58 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Hashcash: 1:28:161106:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net::5ZnYW4GUSWGIcvoI:0000000000000000000000000GGfnZ Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Turris Omnia X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 21:58:37 -0000 I can't find any mailing list specifically about the Omnia, I hope someone here may have some tips... I've put my omnia into production, but the wireless is extremely sub-optimal. Things like the droid netinfo widget show 433 Mbps for the 11ac and 72 Mbps on the 2.4, but throughput sucks. The thoughput seems backwards: upload speeds eclipse download speeds. I'm using it only for my 802.11 wlan; its "wan" interface is on my primary switch, and I've set it for routing rather than bridging, with a /27 for each of the 5.0 and 2.4 (and a /24 its wired lan ports, which are not currently in use). As an example, rsync/ssh/tcp/ip reports net throughput of around 6 Mbps down on the 11ac, and around ten times that for upload. I tried 40Mhz and 20Mhz as well as just 11n on the 5.0 and there was no improvement over the 80Mhz 11ac. I'm doing a (Gentoo) emerge sync right now on the laptop, which only does 11n on 2.4. That is almost OK for a change. On the omnia, luci/admin/status/overview reports 135 Mbps for both up and down from/to the laptop (during said emerge sync). And the rsync(1) output looks like it may be updating about that fast. That is vastly better than I previously saw. But even so, the 5.0 radio still never shows more than a 6Mbps download speed and spikes of up to 300 Mbps upload. I can't find anything online about backwards throughput for 802.11. The only search results talk about wan links rather than wlan links. Does anyone have any ideas of how to diagnose or fix this? Thanks, -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6