From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss <Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problems with DNSsec on Comcast, with Cero 3.10.38-1/DNSmasq 4-26-2014
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 12:40:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37g643zhy.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <536293E0.6070508@thekelleys.org.uk> (Simon Kelley's message of "Thu, 01 May 2014 19:35:12 +0100")
>>>>> "SK" == Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk> writes:
SK> A valid point, but "every leaf system has to be a recursor" is not a
SK> pleasant outcome of widely implementing DNSSEC.
From a security POV, every system needs its own local verifier, and every
administrative domain needs its own recursor. Optimally every system will
have its own validating recursor.
SK> I wonder, do the browser-based validators suffer from this, or are
SK> they recursors under the hood?
They are full validating recursors. Often using libunbound to do the
heavy lifting.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-28 16:55 [Cerowrt-devel] " Jim Gettys
2014-04-28 17:03 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-28 18:37 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-28 18:56 ` Dave Taht
2014-04-28 19:32 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Dnsmasq-discuss] " Simon Kelley
2014-04-28 19:45 ` Aaron Wood
2014-04-28 23:24 ` Phil Pennock
2014-04-29 13:22 ` Simon Kelley
2014-04-29 20:57 ` Phil Pennock
2014-04-30 17:26 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-01 18:37 ` Simon Kelley
2014-05-01 20:26 ` Rich Brown
2014-05-01 22:27 ` Dave Taht
2014-05-02 14:30 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-05-01 18:35 ` Simon Kelley
2014-05-02 16:40 ` James Cloos [this message]
2014-10-03 9:28 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Anders Kaseorg
2014-10-03 17:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-10-03 21:35 ` Anders Kaseorg
2014-10-04 21:45 ` Anders Kaseorg
2015-01-08 16:34 ` Simon Kelley
2015-01-08 17:44 ` Dave Taht
2015-01-08 18:07 ` Simon Kelley
2015-01-08 19:52 ` Dave Taht
2015-01-09 8:52 ` Dave Taht
2015-01-09 15:36 ` Simon Kelley
2015-01-09 16:49 ` Simon Kelley
2015-01-09 21:34 ` Dave Taht
2015-01-10 15:37 ` Simon Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37g643zhy.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org \
--to=cloos@jhcloos.com \
--cc=Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=simon@thekelleys.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox