From: Paul Tow <macskeeball@gmail.com>
To: "R." <redag2@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-users <cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] Missing packages in CeroWrt repository
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:45:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DA80A1.9050104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACj-SW31s_+_2hT3=Y8VFqP1QfjLYJjF5O-4Wd=hW02jerhScg@mail.gmail.com>
The IPv6 comment was from February 2009. Nginx has added IPv6 since then.
On 07/31/2014 07:48 AM, R. wrote:
>
> Great post, Paul. Looks like nginx is indeed the better option in
> terms of performance and stability. Though, going through your links,
> I noticed this: "Lighttpd has had support for IPv6 for a long time.
> IPv6 support for nginx is in the
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.nginx.english/9979/focus=9989>works".
>
> I suppose the devs might have a better answer to provide.
>
> On Jul 31, 2014 4:34 AM, "Paul Tow" <macskeeball@gmail.com
> <mailto:macskeeball@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I installed CeroWrt two days ago and have noticed that some
> packages are missing from its repository. Specifically, nginx,
> rtorrent, tmux, and screen are in the official OpenWrt trunk
> repository for ar71xx (
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/packages/ ),
> but not in the CeroWrt repository. Why is this?
>
> Is it possible for me to list multiple repositories in
> /etc/opkg.conf, and somehow specify their priority? Then I could
> set it to prefer packages from the CeroWrt repository, but still
> have access to packages that are only in the official OpenWrt
> repository. The opkg page on the OpenWrt Wiki (
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/opkg?s[]=etc&s[]=opkg&s[]=conf#configuration
> ) doesn't make it clear if this kind of setup is possible.
>
> Speaking of nginx, I've read that it uses less CPU and RAM than
> lighttpd and is more actively developed, so I'm curious why
> CeroWrt's developers chose lighttpd instead. Does nginx have a
> problem or a lack of needed functionality, or was it not considered?
>
> http://wiki.dreamhost.com/Web_Server_Performance_Comparison
> http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/lighttpd_vs_nginx
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/http.nginx
> http://nginx.org/en/
>
> CeroWrt is a great project and I appreciate the work its
> developers do. Thank you!
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-users mailing list
> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> <mailto:Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 8:34 Paul Tow
2014-07-31 12:48 ` R.
2014-07-31 17:45 ` Paul Tow [this message]
2014-08-01 12:23 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DA80A1.9050104@gmail.com \
--to=macskeeball@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=redag2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox