From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D7B2003F4 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:47:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k27so4275076iad.16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:47:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v09xbXT4w9eJinv00IFrRFCdCFtLhkbg9hmlw8tdLQg=; b=X8IA4/5cUT0nthjtvMAMp/OeT+hVjFiAWbV/UTpB2WH9sRRDlrTNwr3QR8jCcP2BUj ZW7CUys1/3v1tw1sULHQCZFZKuSGfV9FULKhknM/EJJJt5XyaQgPUaY53vDOTMUIfHgJ z//bikMZrJ8DGuF7kW3/y8cDSYUUIa4HiJC5m02oxEZbqXSQ+Cd4HU9FtZGsYXCDXjZt 5/hRyOLz25G7ITPhwpnugSZtJUx7hlpCK+/HzQdwspNp7mf+MzoB9r+grqCzdgGvWkci Mg7N0Rf62aXGblmW4+Cb/CgFRYWPo0xExsoQdRqazBj23i9W6U5Ogq11nILuGjMN0zx9 cC6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.215.10 with SMTP id hc10mr10470138icb.19.1355129270155; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:47:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:47:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121210084522.GA93640@redoubt.spodhuis.org> References: <3147.1355105084@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <20121210084522.GA93640@redoubt.spodhuis.org> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:47:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Phil Pennock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-users , Michael Richardson Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] 6in4 links X-BeenThere: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Support for user problems regarding cerowrt List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:47:50 -0000 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Phil Pennock w= rote: > On 2012-12-09 at 21:04 -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: >> The problem is that the interface that is created is a /128, and it's >> the ::2, but since it is a /128, the ::1 isn't "On-network", so the >> static route fails. > > Er, a /128 means there can be no route associated with it, this is used > typically for things like additional aliases on an interface. Actually, we route p2p /128's via the babel protocol, and distribute /128s via the ahcp protocol. Works great. > To use > this for sending traffic, you'd need a concept of "pump to far side" > which exists for things like a tunnel, but not for stf0, which is able > to talk to arbitrary end-points. > > For stf0, perhaps you want a /16 ? > > You might want a /127 per RFC 6164 (and RFC 6547 explicitly > recategorised the /127s-harmful RFC as historic). Note that a ::1 and a > ::2 would still be on different networks for a /127. You perhaps want > ::2 and ::3 (or a /126 but then consider the ping-pong issues). > > -Phil > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-users mailing list > Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html