From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E3221F182; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so9069463iea.16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:40:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9DGy6p1GuPwtVEJ/NrDNUShAQRv7KIFvXXzLXbDcNFA=; b=XGF2sYkYqHU5H05DbZ+t+iLqL1Hlw+eJM2BoCGnKnH8jmR1PloS1Udo11j0G0Hfvpw Jt0JvKQEzWtzpYPpbVyXSv7RVDZpZg8xitlh3lbeIafGLqwTGnP3jEZu0l0Di863tKch CelJoxVJbSK57UDsp/LWBNZAH6OCrG83IAiyVEMczARovLMdVFOcC7omQY+n43osZ/ZG G+Pq43d7jbB/C/osTPXx5jkTNEjj+H7SM1kkNgJUqIS2rNV3u+qXx36rEsTCzg10vi7w S1LOngTyH4gmAZw6RMvpOmLb6o/VH0REK3q3bMWSPaoQ4JuH7Dh2AGw0I1d4sLWqKMva K4KQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.215.10 with SMTP id hc10mr10458316icb.19.1355128829449; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:40:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <24882.1355094243@obiwan.sandelman.ca> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:40:29 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces X-BeenThere: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Support for user problems regarding cerowrt List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:40:30 -0000 I just noticed that this went to cerowrt-users. There aren't a whole lot of people on that list and this stuff is in heavy development so, forwarding the thread here.... On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head) > version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die... > > There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming > functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support > package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client.. > > Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default > (for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6 > infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change. > > As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system, > damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package > into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab, > can't test it, right now. > > As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as > hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of > the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus, > y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit > more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell > or high water. > > I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for > slaac. It "just works". > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson w= rote: >> >> First question, why are there two radvd processes? >> >> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stder= r_sys >> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stder= r_sys >> >> Is this just a thread issue? >> >> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf= ? >> >> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI? >> I think so....? >> >> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs? >> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and >> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away) >> >> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway >> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself. >> >> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it >> should say, "Send router advertisements". >> >> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd. >> >> config interface >> option interface 'trusted' >> option AdvSendAdvert '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '1' >> option AdvLinkMTU '1480' >> option ignore '0' >> option IgnoreIfMissing '1' >> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1' >> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium' >> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1' >> >> config prefix >> option interface 'trusted' >> list prefix '' >> option AdvOnLink '1' >> option AdvAutonomous '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '0' >> option ignore '0' >> >> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be >> missing it. >> >> -- >> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firew= alls [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net arc= hitect[ >> ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device = driver[ >> Kyoto Plus: watch the video >> then sign the petition. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html