From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8731521F209; Tue, 27 May 2014 10:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id m20so14287498qcx.26 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 10:02:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xhkK719xRzWq04e+Gyly9gIIjWNkBZWf44T5hLHcnOo=; b=xjf4gSqkml/wk8fHJ/0tat7hhluP1T9p4jyCLHXiMfXIKhOuA5k1usrtXGEYtHwvMs Cui29MbRE7Al4uJsJ8mvrz8uPwLtfDnClvzwAwmfl6pFZYykiNrbzf+phvOSgQ3xT5Dd vDE04jAjs6TbSW7fWzWZ18Y9IR7IIIg97LqjMHHziF+nlthxZr6qY2TzOMNo2zJ6uzFW M0iw1685MeuQcCfBPg6Ljujx528sxXz2nJg43D8xpy21kzjucztsReMza19XmrBWKBce lvv4W7fn1fDRYBrb7Swws5ggUj6jM/GSk/eFRYKZPJfCVD4ENaR5UtHd42GHb1Swrf4p Rq2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.126.9 with SMTP id a9mr44481354qas.39.1401210133336; Tue, 27 May 2014 10:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.37.133 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 10:02:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:02:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "R." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-users , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Support for user problems regarding cerowrt List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:02:14 -0000 cerowrt-devel is the right place. On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:27 AM, R. wrote: > Thanks Dave, that worked! > > Only two more little issues that are bugging right now: > > 1. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'new' subnetwork (172.30.43.x) have a > hard time accessing the internet. On every loss of connectivity, I > have to configure the device to use a different port, after which it > will finally reach the net. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'old' > subnetwork (172.30.42.x) do not have that issue. All devices have the > same configuration, except for the mapped SIP port. Not clear to me what you are doing to "map" a port. Post your firewall rules? Is upnp in play? > > 2. Heavy internet usage causes a crash on the Wi-Fi; almost on a daily > basis. It looks like nbd (Felix?) has pushed a few good commits on the > OpenWRT project that have mostly fixed this. I look forward to a new > build of CeroWRT that includes them. We are painfully aware of this problem. See bug 442. It is the sole remaining blocker for a stable release. Are you running with WPA enabled? After taking a break from this for over a week (in part to build up the yurtlab, in part because I needed to do some stuff that generated revenue, and in part because I'd burned out)... I'll do a new build for everyone and then start intensive tests again... While felix just apparently fixed a LOT of broken stuff, none of it looks to reflect directly on the characteristics of the problem we see. I don't see a memory leak, (fixed in mac80211 just this weekend) - what I see is possibly a memory corruption on the crypto side. I did complete a better build for the archer c7v2 that at least has a semi-working switch. Ath10k crashes if you look at it funny. > > Otherwise, it's going great. Thank you for everything you've done so > far with the project! > > (Oh, and I'd rather post on this users mailing list than to clutter > the more dev-inclined mailing list, which I think is what it was made > for. Please correct me if I should do otherwise.) There are very few people on cerowrt-users and I'd just as soon retire it in favor of not splitting the conversation. > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> Cerowrt has broken up each interface into a /27, which gives you 30 >> useful ips in each range. >> If you want a larger allocation, you will need to give it its own ip >> range that has 100 IPs, >> most likely a /24. So in /etc/config/network, you'd change sw0 from >> 172.30.42.X netmask 255.255.255.224 >> to (for example) 172.30.43.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> >> and then the individual ranges are managed in /etc/config/dhcp for >> that interface, where you would change the start option. >> >> the cerowrt-devel list is where most questions go. Thanks for trying cer= owrt. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:09 PM, R. wrote: >>> **Prefix=3D"172.30.42". >>> >>> Finally got a WNDR3800 and installed CeroWRT 3.10.40-5. >>> >>> On my previous tinkering with OpenWRT, I was able to reserve 75 DHCP >>> addresses in the prefix.100+ range. I tried doing the same with Cero >>> by adding static leases and setting "option start '100'" to the SW00 >>> interface, but that didn't work. >>> >>> The devices that are connecting to the router are still given an IP >>> address other than the one that is assigned to them in the static >>> leases table. >>> >>> Some guidance would be appreciated. >>> >>> PS: Unlike what the Installation Guide mentions, the prefix.0, >>> prefix.64, prefix.96 -- as well as the prefix.129 and prefix.160 do >>> not display the "secured interfaces". >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-users mailing list >>> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_02= 96_indecent.article --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article