[Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working?

[Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working?

[R.]

**Prefix="172.30.42".

Finally got a WNDR3800 and installed CeroWRT 3.10.40-5.

On my previous tinkering with OpenWRT, I was able to reserve 75 DHCP
addresses in the prefix.100+ range. I tried doing the same with Cero
by adding static leases and setting "option start '100'" to the SW00
interface, but that didn't work.

The devices that are connecting to the router are still given an IP
address other than the one that is assigned to them in the static
leases table.

Some guidance would be appreciated.

PS: Unlike what the Installation Guide mentions, the prefix.0,
prefix.64, prefix.96 -- as well as the prefix.129 and prefix.160 do
not display the "secured interfaces".

Re: [Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working?

[Dave Taht]

Cerowrt has broken up each interface into a /27, which gives you 30
useful ips in each range.
If you want a larger allocation, you will need to give it its own ip
range that has 100 IPs,
most likely a /24. So in /etc/config/network, you'd change sw0 from
172.30.42.X netmask 255.255.255.224
to (for example) 172.30.43.1 netmask 255.255.255.0

and then the individual ranges are managed in /etc/config/dhcp for
that interface, where you would change the start option.

the cerowrt-devel list is where most questions go. Thanks for trying cerowrt.





On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:09 PM, R. <redag2@gmail.com> wrote:
> **Prefix="172.30.42".
>
> Finally got a WNDR3800 and installed CeroWRT 3.10.40-5.
>
> On my previous tinkering with OpenWRT, I was able to reserve 75 DHCP
> addresses in the prefix.100+ range. I tried doing the same with Cero
> by adding static leases and setting "option start '100'" to the SW00
> interface, but that didn't work.
>
> The devices that are connecting to the router are still given an IP
> address other than the one that is assigned to them in the static
> leases table.
>
> Some guidance would be appreciated.
>
> PS: Unlike what the Installation Guide mentions, the prefix.0,
> prefix.64, prefix.96 -- as well as the prefix.129 and prefix.160 do
> not display the "secured interfaces".
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-users mailing list
> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users



-- 
Dave Täht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article

Re: [Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working?

[R.]

Thanks Dave, that worked!

Only two more little issues that are bugging right now:

1. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'new' subnetwork (172.30.43.x) have a
hard time accessing the internet. On every loss of connectivity, I
have to configure the device to use a different port, after which it
will finally reach the net. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'old'
subnetwork (172.30.42.x) do not have that issue. All devices have the
same configuration, except for the mapped SIP port.

2. Heavy internet usage causes a crash on the Wi-Fi; almost on a daily
basis. It looks like nbd (Felix?) has pushed a few good commits on the
OpenWRT project that have mostly fixed this. I look forward to a new
build of CeroWRT that includes them.

Otherwise, it's going great. Thank you for everything you've done so
far with the project!

(Oh, and I'd rather post on this users mailing list than to clutter
the more dev-inclined mailing list, which I think is what it was made
for. Please correct me if I should do otherwise.)

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cerowrt has broken up each interface into a /27, which gives you 30
> useful ips in each range.
> If you want a larger allocation, you will need to give it its own ip
> range that has 100 IPs,
> most likely a /24. So in /etc/config/network, you'd change sw0 from
> 172.30.42.X netmask 255.255.255.224
> to (for example) 172.30.43.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> and then the individual ranges are managed in /etc/config/dhcp for
> that interface, where you would change the start option.
>
> the cerowrt-devel list is where most questions go. Thanks for trying cerowrt.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:09 PM, R. <redag2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> **Prefix="172.30.42".
>>
>> Finally got a WNDR3800 and installed CeroWRT 3.10.40-5.
>>
>> On my previous tinkering with OpenWRT, I was able to reserve 75 DHCP
>> addresses in the prefix.100+ range. I tried doing the same with Cero
>> by adding static leases and setting "option start '100'" to the SW00
>> interface, but that didn't work.
>>
>> The devices that are connecting to the router are still given an IP
>> address other than the one that is assigned to them in the static
>> leases table.
>>
>> Some guidance would be appreciated.
>>
>> PS: Unlike what the Installation Guide mentions, the prefix.0,
>> prefix.64, prefix.96 -- as well as the prefix.129 and prefix.160 do
>> not display the "secured interfaces".
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-users mailing list
>> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article

Re: [Cerowrt-users] Static leases not working?

[Dave Taht]

cerowrt-devel is the right place.

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:27 AM, R. <redag2@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dave, that worked!
>
> Only two more little issues that are bugging right now:
>
> 1. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'new' subnetwork (172.30.43.x) have a
> hard time accessing the internet. On every loss of connectivity, I
> have to configure the device to use a different port, after which it
> will finally reach the net. The Voip/ATA devices on the 'old'
> subnetwork (172.30.42.x) do not have that issue. All devices have the
> same configuration, except for the mapped SIP port.

Not clear to me what you are doing to "map" a port. Post your firewall
rules? Is upnp in play?

>
> 2. Heavy internet usage causes a crash on the Wi-Fi; almost on a daily
> basis. It looks like nbd (Felix?) has pushed a few good commits on the
> OpenWRT project that have mostly fixed this. I look forward to a new
> build of CeroWRT that includes them.

We are painfully aware of this problem. See bug 442. It is the sole
remaining blocker for a stable release.

Are you running with WPA enabled?

After taking a break from this for over a week (in part to build up the
yurtlab, in part because I needed to do some stuff that generated
revenue, and in part because I'd burned out)...

I'll do a new build for everyone and then start intensive tests again...

While felix just apparently fixed a LOT of broken stuff, none
of it looks to reflect directly on the characteristics of the problem
we see. I don't see a memory leak, (fixed in mac80211 just this
weekend) - what I see is possibly a memory corruption on the
crypto side.

I did complete a better build for the archer c7v2 that at least has
a semi-working switch. Ath10k crashes if you look at it funny.

>
> Otherwise, it's going great. Thank you for everything you've done so
> far with the project!
>
> (Oh, and I'd rather post on this users mailing list than to clutter
> the more dev-inclined mailing list, which I think is what it was made
> for. Please correct me if I should do otherwise.)

There are very few people on cerowrt-users and I'd just as soon
retire it in favor of not splitting the conversation.

> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Cerowrt has broken up each interface into a /27, which gives you 30
>> useful ips in each range.
>> If you want a larger allocation, you will need to give it its own ip
>> range that has 100 IPs,
>> most likely a /24. So in /etc/config/network, you'd change sw0 from
>> 172.30.42.X netmask 255.255.255.224
>> to (for example) 172.30.43.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
>>
>> and then the individual ranges are managed in /etc/config/dhcp for
>> that interface, where you would change the start option.
>>
>> the cerowrt-devel list is where most questions go. Thanks for trying cerowrt.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:09 PM, R. <redag2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> **Prefix="172.30.42".
>>>
>>> Finally got a WNDR3800 and installed CeroWRT 3.10.40-5.
>>>
>>> On my previous tinkering with OpenWRT, I was able to reserve 75 DHCP
>>> addresses in the prefix.100+ range. I tried doing the same with Cero
>>> by adding static leases and setting "option start '100'" to the SW00
>>> interface, but that didn't work.
>>>
>>> The devices that are connecting to the router are still given an IP
>>> address other than the one that is assigned to them in the static
>>> leases table.
>>>
>>> Some guidance would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> PS: Unlike what the Installation Guide mentions, the prefix.0,
>>> prefix.64, prefix.96 -- as well as the prefix.129 and prefix.160 do
>>> not display the "secured interfaces".
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-users mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article



-- 
Dave Täht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article