From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>,
Steven Barth <cyrus@openwrt.org>,
Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
Cc: cerowrt-users <cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interfaces
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:56:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6R_fLHhkE+kU+Q=5xKM0t1Sf93_Sa74HyWCQXGYw3gHA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24882.1355094243@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head)
version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die...
There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming
functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support
package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client..
Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default
(for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6
infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change.
As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system,
damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package
into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab,
can't test it, right now.
As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as
hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of
the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus,
y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit
more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell
or high water.
I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for
slaac. It "just works".
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> First question, why are there two radvd processes?
>
> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys
> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys
>
> Is this just a thread issue?
>
> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf?
>
> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI?
> I think so....?
>
> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs?
> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and
> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away)
>
> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway
> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself.
>
> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it
> should say, "Send router advertisements".
>
> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd.
>
> config interface
> option interface 'trusted'
> option AdvSendAdvert '1'
> option AdvRouterAddr '1'
> option AdvLinkMTU '1480'
> option ignore '0'
> option IgnoreIfMissing '1'
> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1'
> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium'
> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1'
>
> config prefix
> option interface 'trusted'
> list prefix ''
> option AdvOnLink '1'
> option AdvAutonomous '1'
> option AdvRouterAddr '0'
> option ignore '0'
>
> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be
> missing it.
>
> --
> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
> ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
> Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
> then sign the petition.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-users mailing list
> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-10 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-09 23:04 Michael Richardson
2012-12-10 7:56 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2012-12-10 8:38 ` Steven Barth
2012-12-10 13:53 ` Robert Bradley
2012-12-10 8:40 ` Dave Taht
2012-12-10 14:23 ` Michael Richardson
2012-12-10 14:42 ` Steven Barth
2012-12-10 14:51 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw6R_fLHhkE+kU+Q=5xKM0t1Sf93_Sa74HyWCQXGYw3gHA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cyrus@openwrt.org \
--cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
--cc=simon@thekelleys.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox