From: "R." <redag2@gmail.com>
To: Paul Tow <macskeeball@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-users <cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] Missing packages in CeroWrt repository
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:48:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACj-SW31s_+_2hT3=Y8VFqP1QfjLYJjF5O-4Wd=hW02jerhScg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D9FF8E.5070803@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1936 bytes --]
Great post, Paul. Looks like nginx is indeed the better option in terms of
performance and stability. Though, going through your links, I noticed
this: "Lighttpd has had support for IPv6 for a long time. IPv6 support for
nginx is in the
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.nginx.english/9979/focus=9989>
works".
I suppose the devs might have a better answer to provide.
On Jul 31, 2014 4:34 AM, "Paul Tow" <macskeeball@gmail.com> wrote:
> I installed CeroWrt two days ago and have noticed that some packages are
> missing from its repository. Specifically, nginx, rtorrent, tmux, and
> screen are in the official OpenWrt trunk repository for ar71xx (
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/ar71xx/packages/ ), but not
> in the CeroWrt repository. Why is this?
>
> Is it possible for me to list multiple repositories in /etc/opkg.conf, and
> somehow specify their priority? Then I could set it to prefer packages from
> the CeroWrt repository, but still have access to packages that are only in
> the official OpenWrt repository. The opkg page on the OpenWrt Wiki (
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/opkg?s[]=etc&s[]=opkg&
> s[]=conf#configuration ) doesn't make it clear if this kind of setup is
> possible.
>
> Speaking of nginx, I've read that it uses less CPU and RAM than lighttpd
> and is more actively developed, so I'm curious why CeroWrt's developers
> chose lighttpd instead. Does nginx have a problem or a lack of needed
> functionality, or was it not considered?
>
> http://wiki.dreamhost.com/Web_Server_Performance_Comparison
> http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/lighttpd_vs_nginx
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/http.nginx
> http://nginx.org/en/
>
> CeroWrt is a great project and I appreciate the work its developers do.
> Thank you!
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-users mailing list
> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3005 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 8:34 Paul Tow
2014-07-31 12:48 ` R. [this message]
2014-07-31 17:45 ` Paul Tow
2014-08-01 12:23 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACj-SW31s_+_2hT3=Y8VFqP1QfjLYJjF5O-4Wd=hW02jerhScg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=redag2@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=macskeeball@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox