* [Cerowrt-users] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware
@ 2014-07-26 14:44 Sam Chessman
2014-08-01 19:47 ` [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Chessman @ 2014-07-26 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-users; +Cc: cerowrt-devel
Top reply? Well, anyway I bought a refurbished WNDR3800 from amazon
$40.00 to run cerowrt. I was hoping to get a compatible model but it
turns out I got a version with model change to WNDR3800-1CHNAS which
cause the firmware upload to fail gracefully. I found out about
this at openwrt.org, see
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=49390
The above referenced thread refers to an openwrt developer (zloop) who
says he built a version with a different model string WNDR3800CH.
See https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=51025
"according to GPL fw sources the router is called "WNDR3800CH" (MODEL_NAME)
so adding a line
Makefile:$(eval $(call
SingleProfile,Netgear,64kraw,WNDR3800CH,wndr3800ch,WNDR3700,ttyS0,115200,$$(wndr3700v2_mtdlayout),0x33373031,WNDR3800CH,"",-H
29763654+16+128))
and modify the WNDR3800CH model to the Multiprofile line
$(eval $(call MultiProfile,WNDR3700,WNDR3700V1 WNDR3700V2 WNDR3800
WNDR3800CH WNDRMAC WNDRMACV2))
should create an image that can be flashed from factory firmware
PS: it's all untested - no guarantee it will work
feel free to test and send to the mailing list
"
I'm going to try patching the image header to have the model name
"WNDR3800CH" and see if it will load.
It would be a good idea for the developers who understand the above to
add this model to the makefiles so it also gets built. I bet a lot of
WNDR3800-1CHNAS series routers are out in the wild and if someone
picks one up to run wrt or cerowrt they will be stymied.
Sam
> Hi Eric,
>
> I can answer the first question: yes, that's the one. I'm running on
> exactly this since more than a year now.
>
> Best regards,
> Maciej
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Eric S. Johansson <esj at eggo.org> wrote:
>> is this the right box for cerowrt? I figure a refurb should work as well as
>> new for this project.
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122523&cm_re=WNDR3800-_-33-122-523-_-Product
>>
>> btw, as a funding mechanism, have you considered teaming up with Netgear to
>> sell refurbished boxes loaded up with cerowrt? set up inexpensive for fee
>> support forum you have two revenue streams.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-users mailing list
>> Cerowrt-users at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users
--
Sam Chessman sam.chessman (a) gmail.com
"That's how we are, we are descendants of molecules formed a million
years ago because they figured out how to replicate themselves. We
have a name for things that don't copy themselves: dead." -- Cory
Doctorow
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware 2014-07-26 14:44 [Cerowrt-users] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware Sam Chessman @ 2014-08-01 19:47 ` Dave Taht 2014-08-01 20:30 ` Peter Lewis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-08-01 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sam Chessman; +Cc: cerowrt-users, cerowrt-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3899 bytes --] I just put test images up for the wndr3800CH up at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/test-wndr3800ch for squashfs and jffs2. It is otherwise the same as the 3.10.50-1 release. If it works for you two I'll fold the 2 line patch into the build or pester someone at openwrt to get it in there. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Sam Chessman <sam.chessman@gmail.com> wrote: > Top reply? Well, anyway I bought a refurbished WNDR3800 from amazon > $40.00 to run cerowrt. I was hoping to get a compatible model but it > turns out I got a version with model change to WNDR3800-1CHNAS which > cause the firmware upload to fail gracefully. I found out about > this at openwrt.org, see > https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=49390 > > The above referenced thread refers to an openwrt developer (zloop) who > says he built a version with a different model string WNDR3800CH. > See https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=51025 > > "according to GPL fw sources the router is called "WNDR3800CH" (MODEL_NAME) > > so adding a line > > Makefile:$(eval $(call > > SingleProfile,Netgear,64kraw,WNDR3800CH,wndr3800ch,WNDR3700,ttyS0,115200,$$(wndr3700v2_mtdlayout),0x33373031,WNDR3800CH,"",-H > 29763654+16+128)) > > and modify the WNDR3800CH model to the Multiprofile line > > $(eval $(call MultiProfile,WNDR3700,WNDR3700V1 WNDR3700V2 WNDR3800 > WNDR3800CH WNDRMAC WNDRMACV2)) > > should create an image that can be flashed from factory firmware > > PS: it's all untested - no guarantee it will work > > feel free to test and send to the mailing list > " > > I'm going to try patching the image header to have the model name > "WNDR3800CH" and see if it will load. > > It would be a good idea for the developers who understand the above to > add this model to the makefiles so it also gets built. I bet a lot of > WNDR3800-1CHNAS series routers are out in the wild and if someone > picks one up to run wrt or cerowrt they will be stymied. > > Sam > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > I can answer the first question: yes, that's the one. I'm running on > > exactly this since more than a year now. > > > > Best regards, > > Maciej > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Eric S. Johansson <esj at eggo.org> > wrote: > >> is this the right box for cerowrt? I figure a refurb should work as > well as > >> new for this project. > >> > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122523&cm_re=WNDR3800-_-33-122-523-_-Product > >> > >> btw, as a funding mechanism, have you considered teaming up with > Netgear to > >> sell refurbished boxes loaded up with cerowrt? set up inexpensive for > fee > >> support forum you have two revenue streams. > We had had several discussions with netgear's CTO about various options for a relationship. Towards the end, it seemed like my communications were being sent directly to /dev/null. Doesn't mean that they can't resume talks, but I'd rather get a RFP together for the next generation and see who might care enough about it to want to participate. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cerowrt-users mailing list > >> Cerowrt-users at lists.bufferbloat.net > >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > -- > Sam Chessman sam.chessman (a) > gmail.com > "That's how we are, we are descendants of molecules formed a million > years ago because they figured out how to replicate themselves. We > have a name for things that don't copy themselves: dead." -- Cory > Doctorow > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5747 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware 2014-08-01 19:47 ` [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht @ 2014-08-01 20:30 ` Peter Lewis 2014-08-02 15:01 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Lewis @ 2014-08-01 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht; +Cc: cerowrt-users, cerowrt-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4704 bytes --] Flashed it and it works fine. Seems like that was one of the easier support adds to a build. openwrt-ar71xx-generic-wndr3800ch-squashfs-factory.img via tftp was the image I tested. I have not done the jffs2 or sysupgrade image. Cheers and if you're ever in central VA, I'll buy you a beer or alternate frosty beverage. Keep up the good work, Pete On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > I just put test images up for the wndr3800CH up at: > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/test-wndr3800ch for squashfs and > jffs2. > > It is otherwise the same as the 3.10.50-1 release. If it works for you two > I'll fold the 2 line patch into the build or pester someone at openwrt to > get it in there. > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Sam Chessman <sam.chessman@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Top reply? Well, anyway I bought a refurbished WNDR3800 from amazon >> $40.00 to run cerowrt. I was hoping to get a compatible model but it >> turns out I got a version with model change to WNDR3800-1CHNAS which >> cause the firmware upload to fail gracefully. I found out about >> this at openwrt.org, see >> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=49390 >> >> The above referenced thread refers to an openwrt developer (zloop) who >> says he built a version with a different model string WNDR3800CH. >> See https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=51025 >> >> "according to GPL fw sources the router is called "WNDR3800CH" >> (MODEL_NAME) >> >> so adding a line >> >> Makefile:$(eval $(call >> >> SingleProfile,Netgear,64kraw,WNDR3800CH,wndr3800ch,WNDR3700,ttyS0,115200,$$(wndr3700v2_mtdlayout),0x33373031,WNDR3800CH,"",-H >> 29763654+16+128)) >> >> and modify the WNDR3800CH model to the Multiprofile line >> >> $(eval $(call MultiProfile,WNDR3700,WNDR3700V1 WNDR3700V2 WNDR3800 >> WNDR3800CH WNDRMAC WNDRMACV2)) >> >> should create an image that can be flashed from factory firmware >> >> PS: it's all untested - no guarantee it will work >> >> feel free to test and send to the mailing list >> " >> >> I'm going to try patching the image header to have the model name >> "WNDR3800CH" and see if it will load. >> >> It would be a good idea for the developers who understand the above to >> add this model to the makefiles so it also gets built. I bet a lot of >> WNDR3800-1CHNAS series routers are out in the wild and if someone >> picks one up to run wrt or cerowrt they will be stymied. >> >> Sam >> >> >> > Hi Eric, >> > >> > I can answer the first question: yes, that's the one. I'm running on >> > exactly this since more than a year now. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Maciej >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Eric S. Johansson <esj at eggo.org> >> wrote: >> >> is this the right box for cerowrt? I figure a refurb should work as >> well as >> >> new for this project. >> >> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122523&cm_re=WNDR3800-_-33-122-523-_-Product >> >> >> >> btw, as a funding mechanism, have you considered teaming up with >> Netgear to >> >> sell refurbished boxes loaded up with cerowrt? set up inexpensive for >> fee >> >> support forum you have two revenue streams. >> > > We had had several discussions with netgear's CTO about various options > for a relationship. Towards the end, it seemed like my communications were > being sent directly to /dev/null. > > Doesn't mean that they can't resume talks, but I'd rather get a RFP > together for the next generation and see who might care enough about it to > want to participate. > > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> >> Cerowrt-users at lists.bufferbloat.net >> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users >> >> >> -- >> Sam Chessman sam.chessman (a) >> gmail.com >> "That's how we are, we are descendants of molecules formed a million >> years ago because they figured out how to replicate themselves. We >> have a name for things that don't copy themselves: dead." -- Cory >> Doctorow >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > NSFW: > https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-users mailing list > Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > -- Peter Lewis pllewis72@gmail.com [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7176 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware 2014-08-01 20:30 ` Peter Lewis @ 2014-08-02 15:01 ` Dave Taht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2014-08-02 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Lewis; +Cc: cerowrt-users, cerowrt-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5189 bytes --] I submitted the patch to openwrt-devel, it is in http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/6047/ hopefully someone will pick it up. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Peter Lewis <pllewis72@gmail.com> wrote: > Flashed it and it works fine. Seems like that was one of the easier > support adds to a build. > > openwrt-ar71xx-generic-wndr3800ch-squashfs-factory.img via tftp was the > image I tested. I have not done the jffs2 or sysupgrade image. > > Cheers and if you're ever in central VA, I'll buy you a beer or alternate > frosty beverage. > > Keep up the good work, > Pete > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just put test images up for the wndr3800CH up at: >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/test-wndr3800ch for squashfs >> and jffs2. >> >> It is otherwise the same as the 3.10.50-1 release. If it works for you >> two I'll fold the 2 line patch into the build or pester someone at openwrt >> to get it in there. >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Sam Chessman <sam.chessman@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Top reply? Well, anyway I bought a refurbished WNDR3800 from amazon >>> $40.00 to run cerowrt. I was hoping to get a compatible model but it >>> turns out I got a version with model change to WNDR3800-1CHNAS which >>> cause the firmware upload to fail gracefully. I found out about >>> this at openwrt.org, see >>> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=49390 >>> >>> The above referenced thread refers to an openwrt developer (zloop) who >>> says he built a version with a different model string WNDR3800CH. >>> See https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=51025 >>> >>> "according to GPL fw sources the router is called "WNDR3800CH" >>> (MODEL_NAME) >>> >>> so adding a line >>> >>> Makefile:$(eval $(call >>> >>> SingleProfile,Netgear,64kraw,WNDR3800CH,wndr3800ch,WNDR3700,ttyS0,115200,$$(wndr3700v2_mtdlayout),0x33373031,WNDR3800CH,"",-H >>> 29763654+16+128)) >>> >>> and modify the WNDR3800CH model to the Multiprofile line >>> >>> $(eval $(call MultiProfile,WNDR3700,WNDR3700V1 WNDR3700V2 WNDR3800 >>> WNDR3800CH WNDRMAC WNDRMACV2)) >>> >>> should create an image that can be flashed from factory firmware >>> >>> PS: it's all untested - no guarantee it will work >>> >>> feel free to test and send to the mailing list >>> " >>> >>> I'm going to try patching the image header to have the model name >>> "WNDR3800CH" and see if it will load. >>> >>> It would be a good idea for the developers who understand the above to >>> add this model to the makefiles so it also gets built. I bet a lot of >>> WNDR3800-1CHNAS series routers are out in the wild and if someone >>> picks one up to run wrt or cerowrt they will be stymied. >>> >>> Sam >>> >>> >>> > Hi Eric, >>> > >>> > I can answer the first question: yes, that's the one. I'm running on >>> > exactly this since more than a year now. >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Maciej >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Eric S. Johansson <esj at eggo.org> >>> wrote: >>> >> is this the right box for cerowrt? I figure a refurb should work as >>> well as >>> >> new for this project. >>> >> >>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122523&cm_re=WNDR3800-_-33-122-523-_-Product >>> >> >>> >> btw, as a funding mechanism, have you considered teaming up with >>> Netgear to >>> >> sell refurbished boxes loaded up with cerowrt? set up inexpensive >>> for fee >>> >> support forum you have two revenue streams. >>> >> >> We had had several discussions with netgear's CTO about various options >> for a relationship. Towards the end, it seemed like my communications were >> being sent directly to /dev/null. >> >> Doesn't mean that they can't resume talks, but I'd rather get a RFP >> together for the next generation and see who might care enough about it to >> want to participate. >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >>> >> Cerowrt-users at lists.bufferbloat.net >>> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sam Chessman sam.chessman (a) >>> gmail.com >>> "That's how we are, we are descendants of molecules formed a million >>> years ago because they figured out how to replicate themselves. We >>> have a name for things that don't copy themselves: dead." -- Cory >>> Doctorow >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> NSFW: >> https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users >> >> > > > -- > Peter Lewis > pllewis72@gmail.com > -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8169 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-02 15:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-07-26 14:44 [Cerowrt-users] WNDR3800CH varient doesn't load WNDR3800 firmware Sam Chessman 2014-08-01 19:47 ` [Cerowrt-users] [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht 2014-08-01 20:30 ` Peter Lewis 2014-08-02 15:01 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox