From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511D7208ABD for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b25so743073qca.17 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:45:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WiqbFMj/VmGe9aKN1y1BqSiRtRrnLyy8aPUxGL/9ruk=; b=m/XG9Cc4aHutMqvyLzcXsHNzTi15Az1fjP3H/RbL4hPHOexe1z/OiHvsZrxVh+5jtA WSezNkRBSE+wMQxTn9n7KqKmlE6yNONwzXMBD77ofwc3b2JN0L3k03xC+Bw+kHYTKTRu cPbq5qmmnwRoxG4kQbCZaavfL7X+CJaSM7jXpOXxq0zc2wk1AL2EM4S5rxG6rQmATO7B w0RWXhGQ8UD2zlxFZH5MNriJYKJEo6EH/ayn13WGYV/JnVqsK80uNSa3nlB8XA5KyzYN 1EbnlA9M8aYuEP1XAH0Pq9v75dAhgfVp3UNUvVD0mnzkd0zEGh1A2PvF4xonSKXIsxpr 6Duw== X-Received: by 10.229.73.72 with SMTP id p8mr3707539qcj.69.1364737544908; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.61.9 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:45:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Kail Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Cerowrt-users] lower priority of some specific traffic X-BeenThere: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Support for user problems regarding cerowrt List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:45:46 -0000 Hi all, I currently use the latest Cerowrt build, 3.7.5 and I'd like to know the best way to tweak the simple_qos script to my specific needs. I want to lower the priority, and likely starve, some specific egress UDP flows: assign them a very-low guaranteed rate and starve them if there is anything else in queue. Something like "optional traffic" ... if they get dropped i don't really care, it's not a fair queue in this case. I've already marked them with iptables, i need to know which is, in your opinion, the best way to integrate this in the egress tc part. Best regards, Andrea