From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E73C200619 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id qBHA0D0P008223; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:00:13 -0800 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cerowrt-users Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] I should probably kill cerowrt-users X-BeenThere: cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Support for user problems regarding cerowrt List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:00:16 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Dave Taht wrote: > I find it confusing at least presently, to have a separate > cerowrt-users list. I'd rather kill this list > and do everything on cerowrt-devel. Any objections? Just make sure you move users over, and redirect any mail sent to -users to -devel. David Lang