CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] fp sqrt vis int sqrt?
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:50:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336157416.3752.378.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7t4pA7Z_pxLTVoVa6+DujMd3D+Km5m2PKHspyjWL6D9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:39 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> Heh. I'd only gotten as far as
> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <math.h>
> main() {
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> before your mail arrived.

Yep, so maybe we can use a precomputed table of 25 values (100 bytes),
using the reciprocal trick to get precise integer approximation.

(interval/sqrt(count)). 

So that control_law() has no multiply or divide to do, just a lookup in
the array.

Then for count values >= 25, either we can afford an error less than 20%
using the q->sqrt_count maintained in // with q->count, either we
compute the reciprocal each time we change q->count. 

(cost : one divide + int_sqrt() call )
plus one multiply in control_law()

Not sure we need to be ultra precise.



  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04 15:11 Dave Taht
2012-05-04 15:14 ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-04 15:19   ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 15:26     ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-04 15:56       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-04 17:23         ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 17:43           ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 17:44             ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 17:46               ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 23:42               ` Kathleen Nichols
2012-05-05  0:01                 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 17:47           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-04 18:26             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-04 18:39               ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 18:50                 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-05-04 19:04                   ` Dave Taht
2012-05-04 19:16                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-05  8:14                       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1336157416.3752.378.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox