From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED50B2012AC
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat,  5 May 2012 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so3049238wgb.28
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date
	:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Bf+Yj7ddDcR1AXxK1MaPmuj5F21RKKcNT6iLwL8zWa0=;
	b=UoRhSrUs/8KKSe5yxg3JbtsnIKw7WyUmqAmsZVv2f5dHtTKRP1QqwZkZy0zb2c2lSZ
	5kE6UYerD1W9IA+EDk/kZBEL1cdkAiIEPtg9gq7/JdwbAjms79le6KlY0PlRoMlI450B
	HtIquV6AQ/UOPuaTqUep1G2TuEcJlzAHMou9OubWqpsmfEpiIgqMXdjrN24JpMVp6TLY
	afgnpgaMgGAXbmNusrCZ2hUY/DDWG6Oq3+gxLwtE14ZmetXK1YdaYS0mKqtthaSPGfBR
	6tHpM3/sl5BDsb6oIHsa6Fnp3KyULoukqWpYlDTTrh0QuIikTcL+N0oabQ8tqFGbAUBW
	9s/Q==
Received: by 10.180.104.231 with SMTP id gh7mr23405843wib.10.1336255786870;
	Sat, 05 May 2012 15:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.130.107] ([74.125.122.49])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gg2sm13962977wib.7.2012.05.05.15.09.45
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 15:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: dave taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA5A3B8.7020808@gmail.com>
References: <1336217671-20384-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
	<CAA93jw4dXsn+ZCQH+LtZLqBqKXE+q3RUS97Avjy2dHHaCZ+_NA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1336218794.3752.508.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336229343.3752.516.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336249251.3752.558.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336250168.3752.560.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<1336252281.3752.561.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<4FA597C0.7090206@gmail.com>
	<1336252832.3752.563.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<4FA5A3B8.7020808@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 00:09:43 +0200
Message-ID: <1336255783.3752.573.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	Dave =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=E4ht?= <dave.taht@bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH v5] pkt_sched: codel: Controlled Delay AQM
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 22:09:49 -0000

On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 15:03 -0700, dave taht wrote:

> Maybe on your arch, but highly doubtful on a 680Mhz mips that isn't even 
> superscalar.
> 

CPU are fast, memory is slow.

> I'd prefer to leave it in and be able to compile it out, and actually 
> measure the difference.

You optimize the case where there is no need to optimize (small queue)

I can see count bigger than 100000 with 20 concurrent netperf

This makes no sense to have a cache so big.

Or there is a bug in codel